VOL NO REGD NO DA 1589

Sunday, February 12, 2006

HEADLINE

POLITICS & POLICIES

METRO & COUNTRY

VIEWS & REVIEWS

EDITORIAL

LETTER TO EDITOR

COMPANY & FINANCE

BUSINESS & FINANCE

TRADE/ECONOMY

LEISURE & ENTERTAINMENT

MARKET & COMMODITIES

SPORTS

WORLD

 

FE Specials

FE Education

Urban Property

Monthly Roundup

Saturday Feature

Asia/South Asia

 

Feature

13th SAARC SUMMIT DHAKA-2005

WOMEN & ECONOMY

57th Republic Day of India

US TRADE SHOW

 

 

 

Archive

Site Search

 

HOME

HEADLINE
 
Regional corporate scene: feuding ambani brothers
One last squabble before the parting of ways
Anita Jain, FT Syndication Service
2/12/2006
 

          A volley of words between the Ambani brothers who presided over the June split of the Reliance empire founded by their father reflects a final flaring of tensions before the two make a clean break, analysts say.
After months of calm, younger brother Anil Ambam recently levelled a series of accusations involving a gas supply agreement and the transfer of companies at his brother Mukesh Ambani, who controls Reliance Industries.
Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Enterprises (ADAE) says Reliance Industries had stalled the transfer of four companies set to go to the younger brother. The four are Reliance Communications Ventures, Reliance Energy Ventures, Reliance Natural Resources and Reliance Capital Ventures.
The two brothers divided the oil-to-telecoms Reliance conglomerate over the summer after a protracted feud over ownership, eventually settled when their mother intervened and split up the assets of the group founded by her husband Dhirubhai.
It was decided that the petrochemicals, refining, and exploration assets would be transferred to Mukesh, while Anil would assume control of Reliance Capital, Reliance Energy, and Reliance Infocomm, the group's telecommunications unit. The three companies are now housed under the ADAE umbrella.
But ADAE says: "Nearly eight months have now passed after the announcement of the proposal for overall reorganisation. Unfortunately, despite the lapse of this inordinately long period of time, Mr Mukesh Ambani and Reliance Industries, have not completed any of the major activities required to implement the overall settlement, in letter and in spirit."
ADAE says Reliance Industries missed its January 25 deadline to transfer the companies.
Reliance Industries has responded by saying the companies must be listed on the stock exchange before control is handed over and it was ADAE that had delayed the transfer.
Meanwhile, a letter from Sandeep Tandon, chairman of the four demerged entities, to Anil Ambani's nominees to the boards of the four new companies has accused them of intentionally missing a January 27 board meeting to delay listing.
"We have taken all actions for listing and the process of transferring shares is almost over. We want to hand over the companies as soon as possible," Mr Tandon told a local news channel.
Sanjay Dutt, director of Quantum Securities, says he expects the latest dispute to be resolved soon. "This particular impasse should not turn into a protracted tussle between the two."
Also at issue is an agreement by Reliance Industries to supply gas to Reliance Natural Resources, one of the companies that ADAE said has not been transferred. ADAE is dependent on the gas for its Patalganga and Dadri power projects.
ADAE says a gas pact signed last month by Reliance Industries contained "significant deviations" from an original agreement between the sides. Reliance Industries had agreed to sell 28m cubic metres of gas a day to Reliance Natural Resources at $3.18 per million British thermal units.
ADAE has given no details of the deviations, saying only that they concerned the term of agreements and scope of gas blocks. It says the gas pact was signed when Reliance Natural Resources was still under the aegis of Reliance Industries, and was only approved by two directors of Reliance Industries who sit on the board of Reliance Natural Resources.
A person close to both groups said: "There's a feeling at ADAE that the contract is not as watertight as it should be. There's a question of getting tightness around the clauses. This has to be resolved and it has to happen pretty quickly."

 

 
  More Headline
Smuggling of fertiliser, edible and fuel oils to India, Myanmar on rise
Serious power shortages await Dhaka, Ctg industrial units from March next
Savings instruments, bank deposits luring investors away from stock market
Foreign investors keep their heads as pressure grows on Thailand's PM
New export policy in the offing to meet unfolding global mkt challenges
Excess liquidity with banks declines
AL lawmakers join JS ending a long boycott today
PM starts Pak tour today on a positive note
BDR, BSF chiefs meet at Benapole
Mob lynches alleged robber in Ctg
7 dacoits nabbed along with arms
One last squabble before the parting of ways
BSF kills three Bangladeshis
Dhaka trying to expedite export of pharma products to Myanmar
'Asia 2015' conference in London early next month
BKMEA goes to direct poll on April 8
Work on automation of RFSCF office may miss deadline
Tele-tapping to hamper growth of cell phone cos
Pakistan, France formalise cooperation for exchange of knowledge, skills in garment industries
Bus movement resumes after 72-hour strike
Exemption from US double taxation in the offing
developments in the region and abroad
 

Print this page | Mail this page | Save this page | Make this page my home page

About us  |  Contact us  |  Editor's panel  |  Career opportunity | Web Mail

 

 

 

 

Copy right @ financialexpress.com