VOL NO REGD NO DA 1589

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

HEADLINE

POLITICS & POLICIES

METRO & COUNTRY

VIEWS & ANALYSES

EDITORIAL

LETTER TO EDITOR

COMPANY & FINANCE

BUSINESS & FINANCE

TRADE/ECONOMY

LEISURE & ENTERTAINMENT

MARKET & COMMODITIES

SPORTS

WORLD

 

FE Specials

FE Education

Urban Property

Monthly Roundup

Saturday Feature

Asia/South Asia

 

Feature

13th SAARC SUMMIT DHAKA-2005

National Day of Australia

57th Republic Day of India

US TRADE SHOW

 

 

 

Archive

Site Search

 

HOME

EDITORIAL
 
Senate detains Macapagal ally
Roel Landingin
9/28/2005
 

          Norberto Gonzales, director-general of the National Security Council, was cited in contempt of the senate and ordered to be confined to the legislative building until he agrees to answer the senators' questions about how the contract with Washington-based Venable was funded and how the government chose the firm.
Mr Gonzales signed a deal with Venable to help the Philippines obtain grants from US Congress for Mrs Macapagal's plans to revise the constitution to change to a federal parliamentary system.
The controversy is potentially embarrassing to Mrs Macapagal as Mr Gonzales is one of her closest advisers but it is not serious enough to threaten her presidency, according to political analysts. Mrs Macapagal has just defeated opposition attempts to impeach her in Congress over allegations of electoral fraud and corruption.
"It's an example of how politics and government will look in the months ahead," said Benito Lim, a political science professor.
"She'll stay in power but will be subject to constant attacks and criticism."
Her political opponents organised recently what was announced as one of the biggest anti-Macapagal protests, but the turnout was smaller than expected.
Mr Gonzales signed the contract with Venable on July 25, the day Mrs Macapagal told Congress, the lawmaking body, to begin the "great debate on charter change". He said the contract, which costs about $75,000 a month, was funded by private donors.
The senators believed the contract was potentially irregular because it was inviting foreign interference in a domestic political process.
They also wanted to find out who the private donors were and whether the donations were properly booked in government accounts.
................................
Under syndication
arrangement with FE

 

 
  More Headline
Students fare better in HSC exam 2005
Katrina, Rita are wake up calls
Debt relief programme gets endorsement
No need for trade aid fund
Senate detains Macapagal ally
 

Print this page | Mail this page | Save this page | Make this page my home page

About us  |  Contact us  |  Editor's panel  |  Career opportunity | Web Mail

 

 

 

 

Copy right @ financialexpress.com